Haxhiu accuses the prosecution of the alienated property with the "suspicious envelope" from Serbia

The research published on KTV, and the suspicions raised that the Prosecutor's Office has closed the investigation into a property that is suspected to have been alienated, have prompted the reaction of the Minister of Justice, after a suspicious document from Serbia was received as evidence. Minister Haxhiu has requested an investigation. Well, the Special Prosecutor's Office reacted to it

The Minister of Justice, Albulena Haxhiu, has accused the prosecutor's office after stopping the investigations for a million-dollar property in the "Veternik" neighborhood in Pristina, using as evidence an envelope from Serbia through unofficial channels.

In the show "Oath of Justice" that was broadcast on Kohavizion, it was reported on Saturday about the mystery of the envelope from Serbia, which according to the Prosecutor's Office contains the truth, while according to one family it is a fraud.

Minister Haxhiu has written about the case, asking for an investigation and has accused the prosecutors, saying that, according to reports, the authorities in Serbia have denied that they have anything to do with the shipment.

"The case with the land in the 'Veternik' neighborhood of Pristina and what happened with the envelope which according to reports turns out to be a forged document from Belgrade, with which the Special Prosecutor's Office closed the investigations is truly an example of how justice has worked and still works in Republic of Kosovo. So, in a falsified manner, the property is taken from the citizen and in a falsified manner from Serbia as well, the case is closed to the detriment of the citizen", Minister Haxhiu wrote on Facebook.

Haxhiu said that Vetëvendosje has always seen vetting as the only way out of the situation.

However, according to her, there has been resistance from various circles, both in politics and in justice.

"There has been an embarrassment and resistance from different circles, both in politics and in justice, to this process, while we have seen for these 4 years of government how hundreds of cases were submitted only by the government cabinet with affairs from the past for which in no single case have we seen anything being undertaken by the Special Prosecution. On the other hand, we have seen that towards the government, ministers and officials of the subject from where we are, there have been reactions and impulses from the side of this Prosecutor's Office, even for Facebook statuses, let alone something more", wrote Haxhiu.

She also said that the Ministry sent letters to the competent bodies in Serbia to get an answer about the ownership, but never received an answer.

The Minister of Justice has requested investigations into the case, and also into the claims of the involvement of the institutional actors of justice in it.

"As the Minister of Justice, I am really concerned with this whole case, especially, and with the allegations of the involvement of the institutional actors of justice in this case of this property, from the property itself to the closing of the case with forged documents. The responsible authority should urgently investigate the suspicious closure of this case by the Special Prosecutor's Office through forged documents and also address the factual concerns of the injured family about the connections in this case of the special prosecutors of Kosovo with the concrete property itself", he said. written Haxhiu. "Justice has meaning only when it protects the weak from the strong and powerful. When the powerful is associated with crime, then crime becomes organized and institutional. Justice, democracy and the republic also fall there. And this should not be tolerated."

After that, the Special Prosecutor's Office reacted, calling it an "unproductive" approach by Minister Haxhiu.
While denying that the case belonged to this prosecution, the Special has considered the accusations of the minister to be intentional and tendentious.

"Based on the fact that it is not the first time that we are faced with such attacks and untrue statements by Minister Haxhiu, the Special Prosecutor's Office calls on the Minister of Justice and all other persons who aim to hinder this prosecution in fulfilling its mandate of her, to refrain from such untrue, tendentious and malicious statements. In addition, the Special Prosecutor's Office assures the public opinion that such actions of the Minister of Justice and anyone else, at no time and under any circumstances, will not affect that this prosecutor's office exercises its mandate in terms of fighting criminality and pursuing the perpetrators. of criminal offences, regardless of who they are", the clarification states.

Minister Haxhiu, in response, admitted that she made an omission when she said that the address for sending the envelope was Specialja. However, she has asked the Special Prosecutor's Office to respond to the claims of family members in the dispute, that its officials have a hand in the case.

"Regarding the reaction of the Special Prosecutor's Office, I feel obliged to answer that the only omission in my response is the address of sending the envelope and the Prosecutor's Office that has the case in hand, which is the fundamental one, while the claims of the family members who mention that in this case people from the Special Prosecutor's Office are also involved are correct in my reaction and they have already been made public. So the Special Prosecutor's Office, before answering me within hours, should respond to the claims, about which it has never said anything even today", she wrote.

The history of the battle for this property is long. Gaining ownership within 9 months, its seizure or non-seizure, escape, arrests, documents suspected of being forged, involvement of high officials, suspicions of concealment of evidence and until the closure of investigations by the first level of the Prosecutor's Office.

Nexhat and Gursel Sadiku claim that this property was taken from them through falsification of documents and fraud.

"Actually, this is our land, it is historically our land. We have a title deed from 1961 which proves that this land is ours and historically we are in court to prove the ownership of this land. From 1984, when we initiated the certification of this land, we were in dispute with the AKP, until 1999, when the war in Kosovo began. With the end of the 1999 war in 2000, we continue the process where it was left in the Court of Pristina. Since that year, we have filed lawsuits in institutions, in the Courts of Kosovo in 2010, the Special Chamber was formed which is competent to deal with cases that are social contexts with the KPA. In 2010, in the same year, we file a lawsuit to this Chamber, which is competent to deal with these cases", said Egyn Sadiku, the son of the injured party Nexhat Sadiku.

The lawsuit that Nexhat and Gursel Sadiku had filed for proof of ownership was not dealt with by the Court for 7 years. They had not even received an invitation to the session.

"In the year 2020/21, we understand that our land, for which we are in court proceedings, has suffered, has been alienated and has come out in someone else's name," he added.

While the Sadiku family was following the court process for decades to gain their right, the property passed to someone else and even in an accelerated procedure.

This property, with an accelerated procedure, had passed to Zoja Hysen, 84 years old, who had died during the court proceedings.

"In 2014, when Our Lady files a lawsuit in the Special Chamber, a panel of judges is formed again, again of three judges who are the same judges of our lawsuit case from 2010. Within 9 months, in 2015, the right to 9 hectares is recognized land in Veternik, Pristina, part of these 9 hectares is also plot 1743, which is my father's land", said Sadiku.

The name of the late Zoja Hyseni was suspected to have been used for a large fraud scheme, precisely by her son Ylber Hyseni. He was initially presented in all documents as her representative, and then as the sole heir of this million-dollar property.

Without delay, Hyseni began to parcel out and sell the property.

The injured parties, Nexhat and Gursel Sadiku, had initiated a case at the Prosecutor's Office on the claims that the property documents with which the deceased had acquired ownership, according to the graphological expertise they had done, were forged.

The investigation of the "Oath of Justice" and the debate held in "Tempus" on September 13, 2021 led the prosecution to handle the criminal complaint filed by the parties.

For this case, an arrest warrant was issued for Ylber Hyseni, who was on the run, while his associate Afrim Gashi was arrested, who was authorized by Ylber Hyseni to sell and buy this property.

On this basis, the Basic Prosecutor's Office in Prishtina had requested 5 times in a row the permanent seizure of this property, a request that had been rejected five times by the Basic Court in Pristina and returned to reinstatement four times by the Appeal.

The contradiction was that for the same case, Afrim Gashi was being kept under house arrest, until the property was seized.

"In my opinion, it is vague nonsense to say here that there is no reasonable suspicion that he has committed the criminal offense, while there to say that there is no reasonable suspicion that both one and the other cannot be pronounced without the existence of reasonable suspicion," he said. said university professor Fejzullah Hasani.