Oath for Justice brings you research on the case of Naim Abrashi, convicted in three instances of trial for a package with weapons, while he claims that he did not know what was inside and that the cameras contradict the indictment's version.
Can a person be convicted of a weapon without being proven to know what was in the package? How was a logistics worker who says he was just carrying packages found guilty in three instances?
Support the TIME. Preserve the truth.
Professional journalism is in the public interest. Your support helps it remain independent and credible. Contribute too. 1 euro makes a difference.
Letter to the Reader — Why We're Asking for Your Support ContributeWhy don't the security cameras show it at the moment when the weapons are allegedly being packed?
What do the camera footage from March 10, 2019, at a private post office warehouse show?
Why does the court's reasoning describe the packaging of weapons by other people, while Naim Abrashi's name is not mentioned at that moment?
How did he end up sentenced to a year in prison for complicity in the packaging of weapons?
Were the courts to consider the evidence that, according to the defense, puts Abrashi outside the moment of packaging?
What does Abrashi say about his role in this case and why does he claim he was just doing his job as a logistics worker?
Why does the defense claim that the Supreme Court did not address the main claims in the request for protection of legality?
What violations are alleged to have been committed during the judicial process and why has the case already ended up in the Constitutional Court?
Will the Constitutional Court return this process to retrial?